pci device id for my intel pro/100 ve, an on-board lan nic.

btw, judging from pci device id lists in e.g. bsd drivers, there
are many more intel nics that work with this driver.  should these
be added to the drivers, even though they cannot be tested?  it
could alleviate the plan9 hardware-support problem a bit...

also, i didn't modify /sys/src/fs/pc/ether82557.c since i just saw
it existed and cannot test it not anyway.

mjl (mechiel@xs4all.nl)

Reference: /n/sources/patch/applied/ether82557-pro100ve
Date: Wed Oct 27 05:36:00 CES 2004

--- /sys/src/boot/pc/ether82557.c	Wed Oct 27 05:36:00 2004
+++ /sys/src/boot/pc/ether82557.c	Wed Oct 27 05:35:59 2004
@@ -555,6 +555,7 @@
 		case 0x1229:		/* Intel 8255[789] */
 		case 0x1031:		/* Intel 82562EM */
 		case 0x2449:		/* Intel 82562ET */
+		case 0x1039:		/* Intel 82801BD PRO/100 VE */
 			break;
 		}
 
--- /sys/src/9/pc/ether82557.c	Wed Oct 27 05:36:00 2004
+++ /sys/src/9/pc/ether82557.c	Wed Oct 27 05:36:00 2004
@@ -931,6 +931,7 @@
 		case 0x1209:		/* Intel 82559ER */
 		case 0x1229:		/* Intel 8255[789] */
 		case 0x1030:		/* Intel 82559 InBusiness 10/100  */
+		case 0x1039:		/* Intel 82801BD PRO/100 VE */
 			break;
 		}